Is a Crock-Pot the Same as a Slow Cooker?

Short answer: basically yes, in everyday use - but the words aren't identical. 'Crock-Pot' is a brand name that became a generic term, the way people say Kleenex for tissue. Here is the real relationship, and why it matters when you're shopping or reading a recipe.

#ad

We earn a commission if you buy through our links. It does not change the price you pay, and it does not decide our picks — the scoring rubric is published in full, including what disqualifies a pick. How this works.

The short answer: a brand vs. the appliance

In everyday conversation, yes— people use “Crock-Pot” and “slow cooker” to mean the same thing. Strictly, though, they are different kinds of word. “Slow cooker” is the appliance: a lidded countertop pot that cooks food at a low temperature over many hours. “Crock-Pot” is a brand— the original one, so successful that its name became the generic term, exactly like Kleenex for tissue or Band-Aid for an adhesive bandage. So the accurate way to put it: every Crock-Pot is a slow cooker, but not every slow cooker is a Crock-Pot.

Where the name came from

The Crock-Pot was introduced in the 1970s and effectively created the home slow-cooker category. It was so dominant that “crockpot” entered the language as a common noun, which is why a recipe might say “cook in the crockpot” even for a reader who owns a Hamilton Beach or a Cuisinart. When you see that in a recipe, just read it as “cook in a slow cooker”— the instruction is about the low-and-slow method, not the brand, and it works in any slow cooker. The Crock-Pot brand itself is still sold, including the travel-lidded Cook & Carry.

What the name doesn't tell you

Because “slow cooker” describes a method, not a spec, the name alone tells you little about a given machine. Slow cookers vary in size, in whether they are a simple on/off dial or a programmable digital model, and in crock material. More importantly, a slow cooker is not a pressure cooker or a multicooker: it only does one thing, low-and-slow, with no pressure and no sauté. That is the distinction people really need when shopping — and it is the one covered in multicooker vs slow cooker and slow cooker vs pressure cooker. A device like an Instant Pot includes a slow-cook function, but it is a multicooker, not a slow cooker.

The bottom line:treat “Crock-Pot” and “slow cooker” as interchangeable in casual use and in recipes — if a recipe says crockpot, any slow cooker will do. Just remember that Crock-Pot is one brand among several, so when you shop, compare on the things that actually differ (size, programmable vs. manual, and whether you'd be better served by a multicooker that also pressure-cooks). If you're weighing whether a plain slow cooker is worth it at all next to an Instant Pot, are slow cookers worth it answers it head-on.

The hardware

The cookers this page is about

The cookers referred to above, with prices pulled live from Amazon and dated on every card. Full rankings live in the roundups linked from this page.

240 W
Crock-Pot 6-Quart Cook & Carry Programmable Slow Cooker
Not a multicooker and not a pressure cooker — a plain 6-quart programmable slow cooker with a locking Cook & Carry lid. It is here as the honest counterweight to the whole category: if the only function you ever used on a multicooker was Slow Cook, this does that one job for a fraction of the price.
$89.99on Amazon
1,000 W
Instant Pot Duo 7-in-1 Electric Pressure Cooker, 6 Quart
The multicooker that made the category, and still the right default. Instant Brands publishes the wattage, the working pressure range and a stainless (not nonstick) inner pot, which is more than most of the field manages — and it costs less than almost all of them.
$104.67on Amazon

#ad · As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.